Davetrials Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 found one for cheap are they anygood? are they very "fished" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Campbell Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 (edited) Sample shots from flickrthis may be helpfulI'd imagine @ 16mm it wont be too heavily "fished", looks like a nice lens though. Edited May 28, 2007 by dan_brisa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlynnP Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 I know Mike used to se one ask him is your best bet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun H Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 I think this was taken using Mike's Zenitar, I'm not sure. Gives you an idea of the fishyness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Campbell Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 I thought Mike had the Pelang? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlynnP Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 He had both Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Campbell Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 ahhh ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrex Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 Joe Maher has used one quite recently, they are good for close range I think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phatmike Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 I think this was taken using Mike's Zenitar, I'm not sure. Gives you an idea of the fishyness.I thought Mike had the Pelang?Yeah Shaun, that was with the peleng. Joe Maher has used one quite recently, they are good for close range I think Joe's got the Nikon 10.5mm fish.I've had the peleng and the zenitar. On a 1.6X crop it's barely fishy at all, maybe worth having, but it's really not that fishy at all.Edit:Shot with the peleng, with the field of view given by the zenitar marked in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nick Riviera Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 you gone FF now mike?and i'm assuming you didn't take that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Clark Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 Yeah, he was on a 5d for a while from what I remember. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phatmike Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 Yeah, he was on a 5d for a while from what I remember.Not for long!you gone FF now mike?and i'm assuming you didn't take that...I'm not, and I didn't take it (searched for it quickly..), but that is the image you get with a Peleng on a 1.6 crop camera. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom e Posted May 28, 2007 Report Share Posted May 28, 2007 The zenitar is a nice lens. Give's a nice wide 'fish-eyed' effect. Little difficult to get to focus the way you like at first, especially at the wider end. It doesn't seem too distorted on a crop camera, had great results with it on my film slr very fishy.If it's cheap, get it. I loved mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Papasnap Maher Posted May 29, 2007 Report Share Posted May 29, 2007 Joe Maher has used one quite recently, they are good for close range I think Andy, just stick to the car/motor bikes threads..what you know best lol.Since when did my 10.5 ever look like a zenitar lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted May 29, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 29, 2007 so its basicly a bad fish eye, good wide angle?worth 70quid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.