Ali C Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 Because Sidehopping has to have tuckage. I can't think of anybody who can sidehop 50" and above without a tuck.Danny.I vote Dani Comas!! he never seems to tuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan Shaw Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 I vote Dani Comas!! he never seems to tuck.Aye, and he can sidehop higher than 50" too, he is a proper spring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Kearns Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 I vote Dani Comas!! he never seems to tuck.Everybody tucks in some form Ali. Im not talking about the tuck's where your arse is lower than your crank. So much as a crouch when you land on the wall if classed as a tuck .Danny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali C Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 you sure? if thats true, I would like to see anyone sidehop 10" withought a tuck let alone 50"!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Kearns Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 you sure? if thats true, I would like to see anyone sidehop 10" withought a tuck let alone 50"!!Im not 100% sure Ali but i would say so.Danny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex.loves.boys Posted May 30, 2007 Report Share Posted May 30, 2007 Whjo in all honesty cares.Just go ride.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff... Posted May 31, 2007 Report Share Posted May 31, 2007 (edited) edit: piccy dent work Edited May 31, 2007 by Kyle Hinchcliffe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Scarlet Posted June 1, 2007 Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 fair play but dont you think somne people just tuck for the hell of it even on tiny sidehops. i would get pictures from this topic but dont want to bully people. hahaSurely its all about peoples limits?Example being is that I can't exactly sidehop too high, as I'm only really starting out with sidehops and have quite a bit to go, but tucking is bringing the bike up into you and thus getting higher.If I'm only good enough to do say 25", then I'll need to tuck to be able to get to that height, until I can do much higher walls then I can do a 25" sidehop without a tuck.Think of it like this, theres people here who can sidehop 50" and would require a lot of tuck, but 50" is their highest for the time being, so anything lower (say 30") would require hardly any tuck as they can do it in a breeze.My highest sidehop is about 24" so far but of course still got room for improvement, but as its my highest or my current maximum I would need to tuck to be able to get that height. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted June 1, 2007 Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 maybe its too me so long to get the heights i can now cos i only learned about tucking about a year ago, until then it was front wheel awfulness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abdab. Posted June 1, 2007 Report Share Posted June 1, 2007 lmao..Thats f**kin mint gaz. Real big. Youve done it Biffthat walls well bigger then it looks i seen other picks f**king mint biff bollocks thats what i say ! to the sidehops on n then straight off senario u still made it there no shit in that dicksquad lol some people talk shit on here, p.s cant wait till biff comes down my sugerplumbU obviously havent seen it in real life. Think its jut short of 30". Tuk looks cool though.As for sidehop sam did for post. HUGE!. Proper good, get new vid out Sam... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Beckett Posted June 2, 2007 Report Share Posted June 2, 2007 not too much of a tuck on this sidehop,dunno how high......mus be bout 45' ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash-Kennard Posted June 2, 2007 Report Share Posted June 2, 2007 cant be 45, cos i made it lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_Elding Posted June 2, 2007 Report Share Posted June 2, 2007 was like 42.5/43.good thoughhh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 the skips like 50" or just overPOW i sidehopped it YESMAN!!!!!!!!! nop pallets either!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max-t Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 cant be 45, cos i made it lolThink it was. You must have been on a good day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff... Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 (edited) That skips more like 48"DAVE YOUR POO Edited June 3, 2007 by Kyle Hinchcliffe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Swindlehurst Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 not too much of a tuck on this sidehop,dunno how high......mus be bout 45' ?looks about 47-48 if it is 50 looks whey to easy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash-Kennard Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 looks about 47-48 if it is 50 looks whey to easy looked bigger from the otherside, just wait for fatmikes shots to seethe skip was 49" as it was an inch under my nipple and thats 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Manning Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 looked bigger from the otherside, just wait for fatmikes shots to seethe skip was 49" as it was an inch under my nipple and thats 50.SPOT ON!Bessell measured it near the end of the day, it was 49".Me, Dave and porter made it without a pallet.But someone else did it so easy it was as if they were sidehopping up a kurb, lol. think his name was either mike or matt, think he was riding a black adamant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_Elding Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 this is rossy G: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash-Kennard Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 But someone else did it so easy it was as if they were sidehopping up a kurb, lol. think his name was either mike or matt, think he was riding a black adamant.it was the 07 gu and the rider was matt arkwright (sp?) and he was awesome.if it was 49 then -6.5 (pallet) leaves you with... a 42.5"sidehop from the pallet to the skip.told you its wasn't 45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoNnY__Mc Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 SPOT ON!Bessell measured it near the end of the day, it was 49".Me, Dave and porter made it without a pallet.But someone else did it so easy it was as if they were sidehopping up a kurb, lol. think his name was either mike or matt, think he was riding a black adamant.yea that was matt ont 07 gu, his sides are stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max-t Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 yea that was matt ont 07 gu, his sides are stupidAnd taps! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash-Kennard Posted June 3, 2007 Report Share Posted June 3, 2007 and gaps! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts