eskimo Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 saw this tday , its a saracenthat explanes it!UGLY !!!!When i first started riding i used to dream of owning one of those. :$ As for the Giant scooter type thing. What?! rather cool though.The Monty with suspension, how long will it last like that? Surely it would break but if it is just scrap to you then awesome!To be honest i'm not a fan of long Pythons. They just seem too long and silly. Although Monty's are perfect, almost! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrAd-Tpro Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 (edited) Here's a real pic of it, not photoshopped.Does any one spot a similarities?Future bike 2030 ***! Edited February 24, 2007 by BrAd-Tpro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barbra Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Here's a real pic of it, not photoshopped.looks like a big arse cheese grater to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mod Man Leo Posted February 25, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 (edited) damn i wonder how quick the headtube on that would break! Edited February 25, 2007 by Mod Man Leo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(chief) Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 Here's a real pic of it, not photoshopped.that is horible that would be the worst frame to ride ever :sick: chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozonys Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 I don't mind the fresh products frame... looks different. Weather it rides like a wet fish is another matter, but I don't think it looks too bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Probailer2 Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 saw this tday , its a saracenthat explanes it!UGLY !!!!Dude, I just saw the Sacaren Flea and those are NICE.I realy want a Flea.Peter M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cristoff Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 elcristoff! what's so bad about the mission prodigy?The question is, what's right with them?They must be the heaviest, most annoying looking bike in the whole world, apart from that big assed cheese grater thingie that some one else posted, that IS ugly Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeHayes Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 I remember seeing that a while ago, belongs in the dump if you ask me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom 20 Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 The old ones were crap. But the new ones are ok, like toms.cheers josh . You can get a half decent rider on a bike such as a mission then get a crap rider on a zoo! or koxx or something expensive. Just depends if you can ride it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greetings Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 I had one of them, it's called an x-tort. Check this outI win! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lankyri Posted February 25, 2007 Report Share Posted February 25, 2007 INUR did you get bored lol as for most ugly bikei say FAT PANTS'S da bomb when i first saw it i thought yeah thats photoshopped for sure, but no i saw him on a big london ride and he actually rides a traffic cone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrAd-Tpro Posted February 26, 2007 Report Share Posted February 26, 2007 I win!Lmao. That aint really ugly, thats quite nice imo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskimo Posted February 26, 2007 Report Share Posted February 26, 2007 Python with sus forks = 500+ bb rise? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mod Man Leo Posted March 2, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Whats that about?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willh Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
20inchsuperstar Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 now that is a beast!!!i love the python with the sus forks and fat off wheel.i might put 20" wheels on my pitbull, sounds like a devious plan....matt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMunn Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskimo Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 That is actually bad ass.And for that, does it actually work? Seems like someone just went nuts when they built that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LewMadden Posted March 2, 2007 Report Share Posted March 2, 2007 (edited) Is that a disk on the back Lewis, Edited March 2, 2007 by LewMadden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskimo Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Is that a disk on the back Lewis,Yeah, i believe it was a proto one. But it turned out to be too heavy and flexie to be worth using i think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mod Man Leo Posted March 3, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Yeah looks like to me the guy who did the first drawing of that was ether on exstacy or he was having a sesure!Is that a disk on the back Lewis,yeh, its called a rotary disc brake , they originated for performance moto gp bikes .but looks to waek and flimsy for a bike, the rotor is too thin ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greetings Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Well, why should it be any thicker than a normal rotor? It probably already weighs way more than the wheel itself. And what a silly idea to mount the rotor on the rim... If the wheel isn't perfectly straight you'll get so much drag you probably won't be able to ride. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinJI Posted March 3, 2007 Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 (edited) Some kind of crazy floating drive train full sus design. Somehow I think mongoose and GT have the weight/strength advantage over that thing. If the position of everything and the shock setups were right it might actualy ride pretty nicely (other than the vertical head angle!) Floating drivetrain bikes normaly do. Wouldn't wanna bail at speed though! you'd get impaled on bits of your own frame!Edit: Not to mention is BUT UGLY! Edited March 3, 2007 by Dont you Just Hate it When... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mod Man Leo Posted March 3, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2007 Well, why should it be any thicker than a normal rotor? It probably already weighs way more than the wheel itself. And what a silly idea to mount the rotor on the rim... If the wheel isn't perfectly straight you'll get so much drag you probably won't be able to ride.i never said it should be thicker its just on motorbikes rotors are thicker so it works much better, personily i think it will never work on bikes.look at the front rotor on this buell firestorm, it works very efectivley at heat distribution and rotor fade.......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.