Davetrials Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 (edited) Sexymike of mjcycles Saucy cj of cjcycles Edited January 24, 2006 by Davetrials Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Clark Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 First ones pretty cool.Second ones so cliche though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT! Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 First one's excellent, shame about the 3 blobby lighty thingys though. But still, spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downhill_rob2@hotmail.com Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 dont like them, sorry.Im not a big fan of shilohet (SP? ) pics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trials Dave Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 yeah, good pics. i like them. cliche but still good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexymike Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 cliche but still goodwhy is it cliche? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nick Riviera Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 because its been done to death Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munkee Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 First one was wankSecond one was bearable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mavic Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 there alright like first . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dai the Socket Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 First one was wankSecond one was bearableSame.Also isn't Mike spelt "Mike" rather than 'meik' which you used in the filename. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 Liked the second Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted January 24, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 First one was wankSecond one was bearablewhySame.Also isn't Mike spelt "Mike" rather than 'meik' which you used in the filename.meik yes thats right..and why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munkee Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 Ohhhh you want justification too? ... i suppose you get crap replies when all you post is 2 links but anyway since you asked so politely.First one was wank because its my opinion.Second one was bearable because its my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted January 25, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 How could i possibly add more to that post?theres 2 pics ive taken if your to much of a f**king retard to figure out, i want you to post what you think of them, then well i have no idea, why are they shite? cos as far as im concerned your being a negative f**ker, surley u must have a reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phatmike Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 Yeah, christ, Dave posted some pics, no need to be twats about it! Anyways, nice pics dave, got the exposures just about right in those, liked the colours in the 2nd one. Good to see you're getting to grips with the camera too!Nice one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munkee Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 Aww once again we resort to the abusive name calling just because someone had a negative opinion on your clear master pieces of art.Grow up and accept it, my reason is that i dont like them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted January 25, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 there must be a reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trials Dave Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 there must be a reason?yeah, u cant just say you hate them sooo much without a reason for it. i dont think dave is calling you, i just think he wants to know so that in the future he can take better photos. its known as constructive feedback.i like them.Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawnmowerman Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 Nice pics dave, prefer the second one. Try and get a silhouette when the sun's setting, the pics come out orange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munkee Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 (edited) i like them.Dave ok mr constructive feedback... why do you like them? Edited January 25, 2006 by Spacemunkee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burton Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 ok mr constructive feedback... why do you like them?Hahaha!I thought the first one was ok, didnt stand out too much though.Second one....could barely see what the rider was doing.I like pictures that keep you guessing or thinking, not sunsets, clouds, shadows, poor silhouettes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted January 25, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 Cheers mate sorry u wasnt to fond of them, but at least u gave me a reason!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burton Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 Cheers mate sorry u wasnt to fond of them, but at least u gave me a reason!!! Was that aimed at me? Try to take photos that keep people guessing, like someone setting up for a drop gap/bunny hop gap/tap.Keeps people wondering ''did they or didnt they?''.Your Shipley Glen pics were cool though(Y) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trials Dave Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 ok mr constructive feedback... why do you like them?i like the colours and how it shows 'trials' if you get me.i like silhoute pictures in general. they take away the ' oooooooooh look thats craig lee scott etc, instead any rider can get a good pic. all you need is a sunset, a bike and a camera.and theres my feedback.dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattOnTheBmix Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 first one is far too griany for the type of picture and the second one is ruined by the lack of depth and a bike is in the way. those pics are nothing to shout about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts