yoyoyo Posted December 20, 2005 Report Share Posted December 20, 2005 Well someone spends to much time at their computer.I thought it would be a load of bulls**t before i started reading it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted December 21, 2005 Report Share Posted December 21, 2005 My verdect: Bullshit, all one big coincidence Do people not read?It's fake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark W Posted December 21, 2005 Report Share Posted December 21, 2005 Maybe I should edit Bongo's post so that it actually says that, seeing as people are reading that, then just posting "that's crazy" or whatever.Even without researching, that's all f**king tenuous. You could also say "the number of wheels added up on the planes that crashed = 39" "the number of screws in the average desk in twin towers was 39" "There were 3 9-year-olds there. 3 9 = 39" etc. Ah well, it'll distract some people from work for a minute or two, so I guess it's mission: complete... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONGO Posted December 21, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2005 I got one of them, it looks like crap straight the way, it contradicts itself in some place. Anyway, if it was true it would be scary, scary shit.Edit: 3) Flight 11 was carrying 92 passengers. 9 + 2 = 114) Flight 77 which also hit Twin Towers, was carrying 65 passengers.6+5 = 115) The tragedy was on September 11, or 9/11 as it is now known. 9 + 1+ 1 =116) The date is equal to the US emergency services telephone number 911. 9 + 1 + 1 = 11.Sheer coincidence..?! Read on and make up your own mind:1) The total number of victims inside all the hi-jacked planes was 254. 2 + 5 + 4 = 11. Hmm what's wrong there?Hint: "Flight 11 was carrying 92 passengers. 9 + 2 = 11 Flight 77 which also hit Twin Towers, was carrying 65 passengers.6+5 = 11The total number of victims inside all the hi-jacked planes was 254. 2 + 5 + 4 = 11. 92+65=157you are actually wrong here though. There was a third plane that crashed into the pentagon remember, and another which crashed in remote farm land.john Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaXsteri Posted December 21, 2005 Report Share Posted December 21, 2005 Doesn't change the fact its all shit though does it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONGO Posted December 21, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2005 not at all, i was just pointing out that out of the 100 points that atre bollocks, that could have been mentioned in your post, you happened to pick up on one of the only truths of the whole email lol totsl shite though yup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark W Posted December 21, 2005 Report Share Posted December 21, 2005 The part about the amount of people on the 2 flights themselves was wrong though. So I'm guessing the other bit is. There weren't 157 people on those 2 flights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT! Posted December 21, 2005 Report Share Posted December 21, 2005 11= 1 and 1.1 + 1 = 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManxTrialSpaz Posted December 21, 2005 Report Share Posted December 21, 2005 (edited) you are actually wrong here though. There was a third plane that crashed into the pentagon remember, and another which crashed in remote farm land.johnFlight 93 'only' carried 45 people.Flight 175 'only' had 56 people aboard it.So still--45+64+56+92=257 2+5+7=14 1+4=5Oh yeah, in my plight of proving myself right, Flight 175 crashed into one of the towers and fligth 77 was the palne which went into the pentagon. And, flight 77 had 64 people aboard, not 65. Edited December 21, 2005 by ManxTrialSpaz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomR Posted December 21, 2005 Report Share Posted December 21, 2005 You really think some suicidal arab sat down and worked that all out before he went and did what he did? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josephine Posted December 22, 2005 Report Share Posted December 22, 2005 I can't be the only one to have noticed that the star of David is a Jewish symbol and therefore has nothing whatsoever to do with any of this at all. Whoever sat down and made this shit up was an ignorant twat (woo gimme a gold star) and probably though it was Islamic. Man this world is full of dickheads *rages* Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomm Posted December 22, 2005 Report Share Posted December 22, 2005 The star of David is a symbol of judaism and western oppression of the middle east. You know - Israel, Palastine and all that Jazz? It's hardly unrelated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Nichols Posted December 22, 2005 Report Share Posted December 22, 2005 (edited) I enjoyed it more when I thought it was real.P.S. You do all realise that the Twin Towers incident never actually happened? It's just a conspiracy, they're still there really. Edited December 22, 2005 by nichols_sam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josephine Posted December 22, 2005 Report Share Posted December 22, 2005 The star of David is a symbol of judaism and western oppression of the middle east. You know - Israel, Palastine and all that Jazz? It's hardly unrelated. To be honest, if I were Jewish (and religious) I'd be pretty damn pissed if someone had used that. I accept the point about it being not entirely unrelated, though. Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simpson Posted December 22, 2005 Report Share Posted December 22, 2005 9:11 thats 9+11=20Not 9+1+1=11thats like saying 157 so thats =1+5+7=135+7= 12 - 1 =11 oooooh spooky!!!!!!Dum Dum Du,!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.