Jump to content

Now Boys And Girls Your In For A Treat!


Rob_P

Recommended Posts

Now, i've had this on my pc for a while and have watched it so many times I know it off by heart, it just amazes me every time!

I thought it would be best to share the love with you.

Thanks to Sidders77 *cough* gay *cough* for uploading it, decent server so theres no excuse!

ok i'll give you a hint...600+bhp....205mph (Y)

CLICK!! (top link, top gear)

Tell us what you think

Rob (Y) (Y)

Edited by Rob P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

clever journalism imo.

that car is ace, but it's not worth that much brown nosing.

gimmie an F40 or the Rayland Cossie anyday, and i'd kick its ass in both speed and style.

However the start where mr.clarkson is counting the bags of sugar is so cool, the way he says them is just funny to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

clever journalism imo.

that car is ace, but it's not worth that much brown nosing.

gimmie an F40 or the Rayland Cossie anyday, and i'd kick its ass in both speed and style.

However the start where mr.clarkson is counting the bags of sugar is so cool, the way he says them is just funny to me.

The F40 is a shite drivers car. Not good. Carrara GT would whip its ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beats the GT in speed and style? No.

your opinion mate, i ain't tellin you what to like, i said that I would rather have that over a poncy porsche.

I'm more of a rally fan than a cruise around in my shiney supercar fan and would have any of the rally classics over a modern day supercar. (Quattro, CS celica, Delta Intergrale or the cossie), cars which have all achieved something in the hands of people i see as some of the best drivers in history.

I don't like modern cars, i hate the new mustang, ferraris, mercs and 'supercars' like the zonda, saleen etc.

Sure, they are almost motoring perfection, but to me they are bland. (with the exception of the F1 - beast)

Oh and p.s Rayland Cossie 0-60 is (or was) 2.8s (i think from memory might be 2.6) if thats what makes a car cool to you. bubye porsche.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The F40 is a shite drivers car. Not good. Carrara GT would whip its ass.

you gotta be kidding? the f40 is the ultimate supercar! its beautiful for a start but the way it drives is ment to put everything else to shame!. there was an episode of top gear where clarkson drove every +200mph production car and he said the F40 was the best! this was against mclaren F1's and the like. its the greatest car ever produced(my opinion lol)

lol thought id fill you in on that, but the F40 is not a shite drivers car, its close if not the best!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

id rather have a sorted mini any day :D

Good call nick!!!

A Super Mighty Mini would out corner almost any modern car! I'm going with Nick on ths one, for sheer drivers car, I would have a Mighty Mini (and before anyone slates them, go in one first!!). Modern super cars mean nothing to me after yesterday seeing the pace of these cars round Castle Combe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you gotta be kidding? the f40 is the ultimate supercar! its beautiful for a start but the way it drives is ment to put everything else to shame!. there was an episode of top gear where clarkson drove every +200mph production car and he said the F40 was the best! this was against mclaren F1's and the like. its the greatest car ever produced(my opinion lol)

lol thought id fill you in on that, but the F40 is not a shite drivers car, its close if not the best!

Er... what Top Gear have you been watching? There was an episode where Clarkson compared the F40 the 360 Challange Stradele...which has a smaller engine and less power than the F40, and he hated the drive of the F40, it was so bare as well, no comforts of the 360, yet the 360 was faster tround the track by about half an hour... he said he liked the originality and looks, which are gorgeous, but as a drivers car it just couldnt compete... I mean really, why would Porsche and Ferrari create cars that drove worse than the ones they made over twenty years ago... it doesnt make sense! There was a topic on this a while ago and it was decided then the F40 was not as good as a modern supercar...

As for the Rayland... the 0-60 time may be very impressive but I doubt it has the torque required to keep up with the supercars when it has set off, or the torque required to keep accelerating like a nutbar all the way to 205mph...

Torque is where its at :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dunno if youd compare this to a ferrari ... but my old man just sold his practically new SL55AMG and is considering the new aston martin.. i forget which one. And no im not a rich kid... i live away from home n rarely see my parents and never rely on them financially.

His reason for sellin the amg... "had a few of them (amg's) and bit over em now... want to get a really special toy"

thought it wuz a laff... i struggle just to keep 1 bike running and maintain some sort of social life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ditto.

Edit: And Rich, are you saying this piece of shit:

reyland%20cossie.jpg

Beats the GT in speed and style? No.

the dude that owns that lives just around the corner from me.... he wrote it off in the gumball rally though... it was the fastest cosworth in existance.. laptops and all sorts of shit lurking in it i tell thee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...