Tartridge Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 so the drive will be relying on the tightness of the qr? :mellow: ← Nah, it wouldnt, it'd use the pawls. The QR would stop it freewheeling... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Arnold Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 Nah, it wouldnt, it'd use the pawls. The QR would stop it freewheeling... ← oh my god! im speechless :mellow: (adams wrong! ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tartridge Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 Sorry, didn't read Matt's first post. Just assumed the pawls would be left in, since theres no reason to take them out... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will Arnold Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 Sorry, didn't read Matt's first post. Just assumed the pawls would be left in, since theres no reason to take them out... ← those were my thoughts, do what matt said except keep ther pawls in dave :mellow: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
totaltrials Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 go for it phil :mellow:, unless ur tekkin piss. ← When I meant, "me" I meant Mike, as i was on Mikes account, but then I put my name at the bottom, which I didn't even realise I done. Phil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boon racoon Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 yeh i was thinking the freewheel would engage therefore you wouldn't need pawls, but then thought about the chain still having to drive the backwheel ah well, we got there in te end between us lol :mellow: :S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.