TheMunn Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 What do we all think ? I'm thinking it wouldn't take long to snap if you were riding some nice and big street stuff on it, but i'm sure that it wasn't designed for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siders77 Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 Woah! That is one wierd frame! I don't think it would take too long for it to snap if you were using it for trials! :o Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan Shaw Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 Looks very flexy! The paint job is :o Could be nice n light though :S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt_Tupman Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 Beasty :) I love it :S it's so different and thats what makes it great :o Maybe a natural only bike though :S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philth Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 it won't work...everytime you pull the breaks the fame (the space between top+botto tube) will compress putting alorts or bad preasure on the welds. (Y) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 I was actually just sick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt_Tupman Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 philth said: it won't work...everytime you pull the breaks the fame (the space between top+botto tube) will compress putting alorts or bad preasure on the welds. (Y) ← Unless it has been built to have a flexy backend to coop with this stress, if so then I think it could be very nice :o I think a flexy back end on rock is lovely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannie Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 SNAP!! (Y) hehe .dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Drewery Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 Doesnt look very confidence inspiring (Y) Different though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicH_87 Posted March 27, 2005 Report Share Posted March 27, 2005 they forgot the seat tube :o" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eMAyaRKay Posted March 28, 2005 Report Share Posted March 28, 2005 Give it a year and i bet you'll see a new koxx / echo / zoo e.t.c with a simelar design out on the market. (Y) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEVE-0 Posted March 28, 2005 Report Share Posted March 28, 2005 (Y) Look bouncy! rear brake would probably be mush though without a booster...might even screw the frame up because its so weird. emmm good try (Y) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frenchman Posted March 28, 2005 Report Share Posted March 28, 2005 well its deffo different lol Not my cup of tea. Doesnt look like it wil last long Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_Fel Posted March 28, 2005 Report Share Posted March 28, 2005 Why do people think natural riding puts less stress on your bike than street riding? If you ever see any of the yorkshire boys riding natural you'll know what I mean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corish Posted March 28, 2005 Report Share Posted March 28, 2005 (edited) Anal_Teflon said: Why do people think natural riding puts less stress on your bike than street riding? If you ever see any of the yorkshire boys riding natural you'll know what I mean. ← (Y) How you mean? ( I mean about the yorkshire stuff (Y) ) But I do understand you about other bit. The bike oesnt know where it is does it? In my opinion street (not 360 moves and that trials but in the streets is what I mean) is smoother than natural, and in natural theres a lot more to do meanin more stress on the frame, ?? corish Edited March 28, 2005 by Corish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT! Posted March 28, 2005 Report Share Posted March 28, 2005 (edited) That look so, lanky.... (Y) Could do with a seat tube. Edited March 28, 2005 by JT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rago muffin Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 philth said: it won't work...everytime you pull the breaks the fame (the space between top+botto tube) will compress putting alorts or bad preasure on the welds. (Y) ← not if you use disks :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jel Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 Ummm :P :) :o (Y) lol I really don't like that. On the subject of snappage, the top tube would just snap as soon as you do a drop anywhere over 8 ft(?), surely :o . Unless it's titanium :P :lol: :P . Cheers, josh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mintsauce96 Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 mmmmm not sure. Would have to try it! Rear brake would obviously have to be a disk to stop the stay's snapping while braking! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne-king Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 Anal_Teflon said: Why do people think natural riding puts less stress on your bike than street riding? ← probably becasue most people think of street as Holroyd type stuff? with huuuge drops? dunno really :lol: lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.Wood Posted March 31, 2005 Report Share Posted March 31, 2005 dude24 said: not if you use disks (Y) ← Yeh, 'cos those disc mounts look beefy! Heh, it could be the best riding bike in the world ever... I'd still be scared to sit down on the top tube though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boothy Posted April 7, 2005 Report Share Posted April 7, 2005 Like it, except the square down tube. Although it looks about as strong as a wet paper bag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backgren Posted April 8, 2005 Report Share Posted April 8, 2005 hahaha doesn't anyone here remember that Monty made a bike without seat tube about ... 7 years ago? it had a seat though ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janson Posted April 8, 2005 Report Share Posted April 8, 2005 I read about this frame on a Swedish forum.. Tis a Swedish frame, made out of mild steel. Heavy as fook, and was just a project to learn to weld bike frames. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Connor Posted April 19, 2005 Report Share Posted April 19, 2005 that will snap too easy and it has a weird painting :huh: :P" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.