Guillermo Marin Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 Just pics, i don't have info about this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siontyrex Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 looks awesome!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Gibbs Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 No stocks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCOTTY___ Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 Ugly.. as.. fuc* 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack dickinson Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 The bb hight on the top one looks about 90-105 + Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onzatpro09 Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 Top one is alright, middle two are not particularly pleasant and the bottom one is nightmare inducingly bad looking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waybe2014 Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 Agreed wth is going on with the last one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perez Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 No No No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack dickinson Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 If you havent noticed apart from the top one they are kids bikes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waybe2014 Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 (edited) All I can tell from those pics is 1+4 are mods and 2+3 are 24/26 most likely. Just noticed the V's so 3 is a kids bike Edited July 15, 2014 by waybe2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack dickinson Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 All I can tell from those pics is 1+4 are mods and 2+3 are 24/26 most likely Id say they were all 20 or less, notice the wellbase. Id say the top was full sized judging by the afvanced geo going to smaller kids as the bikes went down.Also they all have bash plates so i must be correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waybe2014 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Ok missed the bash plates so I concede definitely no 24/26 in there. Explains why only 1 looks good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alistair14 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 they look shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dann2707 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Top one is nice. Wonder if monty will ever make non curvy frames. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bing Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Top one is a normal std mod, ie 221 kamel/m5. Next one down is with twin 20" wheels. Next one is with 18" wheels. Bottom one will be kids 205 level with 16" wheels Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake. Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Id say they were all 20 or less, notice the wellbase. Id say the top was full sized judging by the afvanced geo going to smaller kids as the bikes went down. Also they all have bash plates so i must be correct. Congratulations, your first ever correct answer? 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack dickinson Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Congratulations, your first ever correct answer? Is thw ither peraon going to be mmocked and made fun of now, just because he put his oppinin? And iys not acually my first correct answer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JD™ Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 (edited) Jesus. f**king. Christ. I've bitten my tongue. But you really need to f**king HOLD THE f**k ON before you press the 'post' button. You say you can spell, not type, so take two seconds to re-read what you've posted and take a little time to correct your typing errors. I promise you 100% that you wouldn't need to ask things like "Is thw ither peraon going to be mmocked and made fun of now?" if you checked all your posts, because you make yourself an easy target by coming across as a complete and utter f**kwit. EDIT: And/or hit the 'edit' button like I just had to... Edited July 16, 2014 by JD™ 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waybe2014 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Can't really mock me for being wrong when I already conceded I was wrong and gave reason behind my wrong conclusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack dickinson Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Can't really mock me for being wrong when I already conceded I was wrong and gave reason behind my wrong conclusion. I was being sarcastic because people do it to me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJ Leigh Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 (edited) I was being sarcastic because people do it to me. ha! I wonder why... seriously your wrong like all the time so just listen to JD. also if you spell words wrong on a computer, how the hell can people take you seriously anyway? heard of spelling corrections cuz of the red line? *because siri iriot Edited July 16, 2014 by JJ Leigh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexClare94 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Hmm never been keen on monty bikes, and always seen youngsters riding them, but top one looks a bit better...but from the M5 carbon to that? Pretty much a massive downgrade don't you think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stirlingpowers Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Hmm never been keen on monty bikes, and always seen youngsters riding them, but top one looks a bit better...but from the M5 carbon to that? Pretty much a massive downgrade don't you think? Why from? M5 still the high-end bike, the one on the first pic will be the mid-range solution with "adult comp" geo, using alu hydroforming and welding instead of carbon monocoque and less expensive parts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HippY Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Hmm never been keen on monty bikes, and always seen youngsters riding them, but top one looks a bit better...but from the M5 carbon to that? Pretty much a massive downgrade don't you think? Depends on the point of view Yes the frame has been downgraded, but we were talking about a seriously high end frame(-kit) with extremely high price tag and with low area of usage( for example you can use a DH bike that cost the same as a normal bike as well, whereas this is really only a trials bike) Whereas the same frame structure with aluminium is still light, strong but much more cheaper, so more people can buy them Basically like BMW shows the M3 but most of the people are going to buy 320d anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark W Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 I wonder if putting your cranks on at that 120° angle (or whatever it is) on the top bike is going to be the new 'thing'. "Yeah, I can get even shorter run-ups..." 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.