Jump to content

The Angry Thread.


Blake

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Failed to understand during a recent London visit how I was able to get an impressive 4G network whilst travelling on the jubilee line from Canning Town to Westminster watching YouTube content, but struggled to get decent 4G/5G when outside on the streets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Really hope the behind the scenes politics doesn't get involved in tonights Grand final.

Ireland Bambi Thug had to remove a tattoo on left side of her face before her semi final performance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/16/2024 at 3:13 PM, MadManMike said:

Why does this make you angry?

Without taking the pun literally, the government has been back pedalling the victorian law for too long

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's The Victorian Law?

 

Road users use the roads therefore have to obey the rules of their usage, whether you're on a bike or in a lorry. The fact this isn't already law is a joke. If "The Victorian Law" says to the contrary then I think it SHOULD be gone back on.
The flip side of that is that they should also all be protected by it. I ride to work and nearly get killed every single morning, and again on the way home, purely because people, at best, don't look, at worst, intentionally cut me off/up / sideswipe me into a ditch.
I stop at red lights, use cycle paths and don't think I'm physically capable of breaking the speed limit. Even if I used a headcam and had evidence nothing would happen.

 

The big problem they will have in policing this (it won't get through anyway, so no matter) is that bicycles don't have speedometers, so there's no way to know if you're doing 20 or 23.
I think it SHOULD be a law, and cyclists SHOULD obey the rules of the road, but the speed aspect specifically is problematic.
If you hit and injure someone on a bike, the consequences should be the same as if you were in a car. I never even thought that WASN'T the case :lol:

Edited by aener
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bought a new dirt frame.

I asked the guy for the condition and I asked explicitly for dent, cracks or deformation.

He said there was none.

I received the frame today and the seat tube is cracked and deformed.

I asked for a refund. The guy first gesture was 30 Euros... For a frame I paid 300 with cranks, seat post, headset and a disc rotor.

He went up to 50euros.

I think it is still unfair and he does not want to get the frame back (I even proposed to bear  the shipping cost).

He said the damage was visible on the pics.

I did not used PayPal unfortunately.

 

I am tempted to lodge a complaint (not too complicated here in Germany).

What do you think?

IMG_20240521_122734998_HDR.jpg

IMAGE_6eabd5d4-0d1d-4ea0-be5e-d466731e720e.jpg

IMAGE_448e03b8-d304-4c75-bdfc-8ac9bcdcc532.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Had to watch this a few just to check if this is real or fake. She doesn't even react to the horn of the train. And what the f**k was so important to get a selfie there.

Edited by Rusevelt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/28/2024 at 1:20 AM, Rusevelt said:

How the f**k democrats supporters can be so delusional to stick with a mumbling 81yr old after this performance?

 

Have you seen the alternative?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kennedy seems half decent too.

 

I’m pleased that the world is finally accepting that Biden really isn’t healthy enough to be President, he’s been showing senile tendencies for years yet the media and his followers never seemed to want to talk about it. Not a huge trump fan but I do think he’s the better out of those two…Southpark nailed it years and years ago with their giant douche and turd sandwich episode 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, monkeyseemonkeydo said:

Is Kamala Harris not a viable alternative?

She is, but no longer has the 'balls' (literal sense and not sexually) she once had we she contested against Biden for democrats leadership. She seems contempt to lie low than rather prepare herself that she is ready to step in Biden's shoes at any given moment should his general health or mental state gets the better off him.

It just seems behind the scenes that the democrats are not ready or willing to prepare Harris to step in which is a dangerous precedence when Jill Biden is the force pushing her own husband to stay even though she knows her husband has some form of dementia. 

Biden needs some form of medical NZT-48 neurotrophic wonder drug like from the movie Limitless...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2024 at 9:43 AM, monkeyseemonkeydo said:

Is Kamala Harris not a viable alternative?

Fair enough, misinterpreted the comment. Honestly if Biden wins I think Harris will take over at some point in the 4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, JT! said:

Fair enough, misinterpreted the comment. Honestly if Biden wins I think Harris will take over at some point in the 4 years.

No, I think I started to reply to your comment relating to Trump the cunt but then reread your comment and reinterpreted it as who could stand for the Democrats instead of Biden!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...