dann2707 Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 Toblerone killed my first pet Hamster I'm guessing they planned for it to die seems though the triangle looks so similar. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casualjoe Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 Then ask yourself who owns everything! I did, the answer is... nobody. That's the problem, nobody has a clue what is going on here, we rose from the dirt with all other life forms. When put in this context, we haven't done too badly, but sure there is a long way to go. The 'great' thing about the internet is that you can always find someone saying what you are thinking, whether it's right or not. To be honest, I'm more disappointed about http://designtaxi.com/news/353097/London-Officials-To-Erase-Banksy-s-Latest-Olympic-Street-Art/ but yea it must be shit for those directly involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisTrials2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 mainstream media tells the world what to think eat do save spend how to act how to dress! same as the tv! who owns the mainstream media ? Then ask yourself who owns everything! do you really think governments care about people? all they care about is their bank balance ! look i can lead you to knowledge but i cant make you think ! you have to do that ! i will stand up for what i belive in ! even if i have to stand alone! Not that i am! .......................2012 was an inside job Everyone will soon ask them selves how did the world get like this! simple question ! THE PEOPLE! Because YOUR ignorance IS THEIR POWER ! i read a hell of a lot ! i dont just take that .i then do my homework! ive done my work ive said what i needed to say When you say you read, what do you read? No book I've ever opened has had that much bullshit spewing from it like the words that flow from your keyboard. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeyseemonkeydo Posted July 24, 2012 Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 2012 was an inside job I can ignore the rest of your posts but that statement confuses me. This year was inside job? The Olympics were an inside job? That random film with John Cusack was an inside job? 2012 backwards is 2102! Think about it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rusevelt Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 Anyone here seen the little teaser reheasral footage of the opening ceremony, where there are bike riders wearing some luminated winged costume. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewEH1 Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 (edited) Just received this in my email spam box...looks like were f**ked From Anonymous apparently... Multiple indicators suggest that the 2012 London Olympics may be used as a stage for false flag operations: the environment is primed for insider attacks, the security plans are flawed, and the threat indicators match other false flag attacks. Large amounts of troops, contractors, and weapons may provide cover for insider agents to carry out attacks at the 2012 London Olympics. Excessive amounts of force and materiel combined with the last minute changes provide a chaotic environment in which equipment may be staged to carry out terrorist attacks. Such a chaotic environment is also ideal for subversive agents that have security credentials to operate in, because it provides them with cover stories for their activities and possible inconsistencies in their behavior. Security plans for the 2012 London Olympics are flawed. An independent investigation of the G4S security contractor by Ben Fellows has revealed that the company is implementing measures that are inconsistent with their stated security objectives. G4S is reported to have 200000 casket linings on standby - a measure that indicates a plan to fail at security. G4S is reported to have plans for evacuating London - another indicator of planned failure. G4S is well documented as failing to provide adequate security staff. The combination of these factors suggests that instead of providing qualified security staff to prevent attacks, G4S has been focusing on controlling the effects of an attack. Mitigating large scale disasters is usually handled by the government. It is suspicious that a company that fails at its direct responsibilities expends its limited resources on measures that are outside of its competence and stated objectives. These indicators are especially alarming, since security contractors have privileged access and are therefore well placed to carry out large scale terrorist operations, to plant false evidence, and to destroy real evidence. The threat indicators present at the 2012 London Olympics are consistent with the false flag terrorism operations carried out in the past. The film "7/7 Ripple Effect 2" provides a thorough analysis of a recent false flag operation in London and provides a publically available primer of some of the tradecraft that may be used for other false flag operations. Some examples of documented tradecraft include using security credentials to manage subversive agents, using security operations to stage equipment for attacks, using security credentials to place false evidence, using security credentials to destroy real evidence, and fabricating public reports. These examples of tradecraft match the threat indicators present at the 2012 London Olympics and support the concerns for the safety of the public. False flag operations are typically conducted to manipulate public opinion. False flag operations are frequently used as pretext for war. It might be too late to provide an effective deterrent for the possible attacks at the London Olympics at this point. Even if it is too late to prevent such attacks, vigilance is needed to mitigate the risk of false flag operations being used as pretext for even greater bloodshed and to bring the responsible parties to justice if such attacks take place. Edited July 27, 2012 by AndrewEH1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JD™ Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 Got bored at 'plans to evacuate London meaning planned failure' or whatever. No, that's called a contingency plan. What a bunch of f**kwits. Not only do I not want a terrorist attack for the obvious reasons, I also don't want one so I can spam the shit out of all these numpties afterwards... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew62 Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 What happened to the Israeli illuminati in the end? Dave? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewEH1 Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 What happened to the Israeli illuminati in the end? Dave? Did you not see One Direction 'perform' at the closing ceremony? Get a grip man, they're everywhere! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dann2707 Posted August 16, 2012 Report Share Posted August 16, 2012 They "got the date wrong" probably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Swales Posted August 16, 2012 Report Share Posted August 16, 2012 What happened to the Israeli illuminati in the end? Dave? You saw them build that big pyramid right? The one that looked like that thing that looks like that other thing, the triangle? There's your evidence... As much as I know it's completely not what happened, I like to think the organisers saw Dave's post in here and all the other Illuminati stuff and put that pyramid in at the end just to mess with their heads. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew62 Posted August 16, 2012 Report Share Posted August 16, 2012 Of course...I see, it's obvious now you mention it. I wonder how they'll work the octopus in the closing ceremony in to the illuminati conspiracy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeyseemonkeydo Posted August 16, 2012 Report Share Posted August 16, 2012 I wonder how they'll work the octopus in the closing ceremony in to the illuminati conspiracy? You are kidding aren't you? How many tentacles does an octopus have?... Myanmar Cyclone and China’s 2008 Earthquake Both the cyclone that hit Burma and the earthquake that struck China tightly coincided with the same HAARP activity. HAARP was also highly active in the weeks before Katrina, during, and a short time after. The correlation is therefore not complete. If HAARP were inactive during that time, then it could be proven that it had absolutely nothing to do with Katrina, but since it was indeed active, a possible link still remains. There is not enough actual energy being outputted by ionospheric heaters to directly power an earthquake, but they don’t need that much power if they merely act as nonlinear unbalancers, triggers, or re-directors of existing large natural energy flows. Was the earthquake just a random natural event? Or was it strategically and intentionally created? Consider this: The official death toll was 80,000. 1) HAARP shut off ~8 hours before the quake struck. 2)Earthquake was of magnitude 8.0. 3) It happened on May 12th (5/12 = 5 + 1 + 2 = 8) 4)The earthquake occurred exactly 88 days before the Beijing Olympics. 5)The Olympics began on 8/8/08 at 8:08 PM. What’s the illuminati significance to the number 8? Occultist L. Ron Hubbard and the church of Scientology has fondness for the number 8 and used it extensively in scientology, as in Hubbard’s books named Technique 88, Scientology 8-80, and one called 8-8008. There are also 8 dynamics, and their gradation chart of awareness, is set up on 8s too, there are 8 levels to “Clear” and then 8 levels to OT8..now jump back to the 1930’s, Hitler’s SS – SS is the closest approximation in letters to 88. Note the colors and feeling of the Scientology Management logo below from their own pages. It’s nothing more than a swastika bent into the numbers 88 (another multiple of 11) with two pyramids intertwined….do you see that? Scientology Managment – Office of Special Affairs Logo© by The Fraud of $cientology Long before Hitler’s SS gained power over the German government, to keep from getting into trouble for saying, “Heil Hitler” in their correspondences, they would sign them 88, because “H” is the 8th letter of the alphabet, hence 88 became the secret signature, at the end of letters sent to his blinded supporters and members of the Nazi Party, for H*eil *Hitler…..SICKENING! Coincidence? Or more illuminati planned events using occult numerology? Taken from some random conspiracy site that goes on to give the importance on the number 11 from Air Force One having 11 letters, to 9/11 and the Kennedy assassination. I'm all for a good conspiracy theory but if there were and illuminati thing going on, it's blatantly Carol Vordermen behind it if all these numeric coincidences are true. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Swales Posted August 16, 2012 Report Share Posted August 16, 2012 That's how they get you (I assume that's their aim, to 'get' people?) - they rely on your ignorance (which, as we know, is their power). As for the octopus, I'm not sure, but it definitely had some pretty big (all seeing?) eyes. Also: kinda looks like: if you half close your (all seeing) eyes. Also, the giant octopus was lit up or, if you will, illuminated. Illuminati, illuminated, Illuminati'd. Coincidence? I think not so. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamR28 Posted August 16, 2012 Report Share Posted August 16, 2012 Wow, I am SO glad UK tax payers spent f**k knows how many millions for those tossers at Wolf Ollins to make such a cock up of the logo I realise I am rather late here But the logo design 'only' cost £450,000... And they had 'London 2102' on one of the umpire's chairs for the tennis. Fail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Rainbird Posted August 16, 2012 Report Share Posted August 16, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeyseemonkeydo Posted August 16, 2012 Report Share Posted August 16, 2012 I realise I am rather late here But the logo design 'only' cost £450,000... And they had 'London 2102' on one of the umpire's chairs for the tennis. Fail. That was only the logo though. Imagine how much was spent on designing the font and all the other pointless guff that went with it. I must admit though that in retrospect, although I hate the millions wasted by Locog, I'm very proud of the athletes and what they've achieved and also the raise in public spirit that has gone with the Games. My take on it is that the Games were very badly 'sold' to the public and I feel that the bad feeling started with that shite logo and never recovered because they never pushed the positive side of things. Little details like letting the public know that for every GB gold medal the athlete's local postbox would be painted gold would have made the OIympics feel more personal and more about the athletes and national pride than only showing us a shit logo, how much the transport system would be screwed and who was going to get the privilege of knocking down the stadium to build a stadium. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew62 Posted August 16, 2012 Report Share Posted August 16, 2012 I don't think the £450,000 was just for the logo - it was for the entire branding of the whole event which would include the typeface, pictograms, tickets, website, event banners, display boards, stadium pieces (seating, track markings, flooring) and then the things like the marathon marker boards and thousands of pieces of signage around the whole games. Whilst those little things aren't the pinnacle of design each and every one has to be made which takes a huge amount of time which goes some way in to making up for the cost. Wolff Ollins wouldn't have been able to create the logo mark without the additional pieces so Locog didn't just hand them £450,000 for the logo only. I must say despite my continued explanation of what work went in to everything I still think the logo itself is horrid, but would still argue that the identity as whole was unified and certainly an improvement on anything in the last 30 years and will stand out compared to others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Swales Posted August 16, 2012 Report Share Posted August 16, 2012 You look different with long hair... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Booth Posted August 18, 2012 Report Share Posted August 18, 2012 i hope your right mathew! rick clay! google him youtube him listen..YOU DONT HAVE TO BELIVE make your own mind up simples I don't understand, you keep saying 'YOU DON'T HAVE TO BELIEVE MAKE YOUR OWN MIND UP!!' Believe in what? I've made my mind up, mine says your a knob. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolver Posted August 18, 2012 Report Share Posted August 18, 2012 It's funny that it's only stoners who get sucked into the conspiracy theory stuff. I know two other people who've tried to convince me that there's an illuminati, and they're both stoners. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krazykid009 Posted August 18, 2012 Report Share Posted August 18, 2012 It's got to be the illuminati, who else would make the logo look like Lisa Simpson giving head to Bart? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.