Tomm Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Hey guys, here's the blueprint for a perpetual motion machine. Prove it wrong. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manuel Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 the plane takes off this time fo sho. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukasMcNeal Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 (edited) Non perpetual - Its thought that the bubbles would rise through the water and turn the belt. However pushing the bubbles into the water at the bottom would require more energy than the floating generates. Edited July 21, 2011 by LukasMcNeal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hannah Shucksmith Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 MY GOD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete.M Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 I can't be the only one sitting here staring at it! Actually the strinf/chain holding the bubbles would bundle at the top and there wouldnt be sufficient lift from them to cause rotation. Yeah, also can't see the air pockets making it through the seal with that pressure of water above them. Funny idea though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Nichols Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 So many flaws! Very amusing though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greetings Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 The pressure on the balls entering the water tank from the bottom would probably be too big to allow them to pass through the seal. It's a great idea though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Nichols Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 They haven't designed an frictionless generator either yet. Or frictionless pulleys. And the concept of a seal relies on friction to function! Sooooo much friction! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.Wood Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Show something fun to trials riders and they'll talk about physics. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadManMike Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 They haven't designed an frictionless generator either yet. Or frictionless pulleys. And the concept of a seal relies on friction to function! Sooooo much friction! I prefer non-friction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dann2707 Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 LOL reminds me of this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laurence--Trials Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 funny thread, any more of them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Nichols Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Show something fun to trials riders and they'll talk about physics. I was being light hearted! Already said it was amusing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Second law of thermodynamics. End of discussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dann2707 Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Can someone explain why the magnet car wouldn't work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Nichols Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Can someone explain why the magnet car wouldn't work? Newtons laws of motion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali C Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Can someone explain why the magnet car wouldn't work? really? I have thought of some machines, a lot of them involve being in space and/or water, but that darn grouch called frictions still seems to want to ruin the party! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dann2707 Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 really? Well I knew it wouldn't work. It just wouldn't. But wanted an explanation why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDoom Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 http://jforjustice.co.uk/banksters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT! Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 (edited) Edited July 21, 2011 by JT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topsy Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 next wish must be "I'd wish you could give me 10 more wishes" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukasMcNeal Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 There would be more friction than energy produced though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casualjoe Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 Light bulbs float pretty well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JD™ Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 Far smarter minds than anyone reading (or writing) this have spent far more time than anyone reading (or writing) this to work out whether a perpetual motion machine is possible, what with the fact it'd be the most important invention in the history of time. I think even TF will have found it's limitations with this one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew62 Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 Leonardo Da Vinci deduced that perpetual motion is not possible. And he'd know, cus he had a sexy ass beard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.