Matt Vandart Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 It has a 135mm rear end (unlike the Kabra's 116mm), it has a normal headtube (unlike the Kabra's internal headset setup), I prefer the overall looks of the frame, I prefer the dropouts and the integrated tensioners, I prefer the fact it's 200g lighter, and I prefer the straight downtube. Don't really mind curvy top tubes so much, but there's something about banana down tubes that looks wrong Having said that, the geo's fairly different so if, hypothetically, I wanted that geometry I'd go for the Kabra. Why is this an advantage? I'm liking the look of the Kabras Geo to be honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark W Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 Wider spaced flanges on your rear wheel = bueno, especially bearing in mind the larger rim diameter. There's arguably more scope for rear hubs too. Plus it looks better Stay tuned for the Kabra geo too - when I measured it, it was a bit different to what Kabra said so Ads is just double checking... EDIT: Yeah - the BB's +65mm... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.