Joe@Onza Posted June 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 It will be here in 2 weeks and it will cost £339. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben John-Hynes Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Absolutely LOVE that. Nice looking bike, good spec, cheap price, low weight. Bang on again, Onza! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pengsmelly Posted June 15, 2009 Report Share Posted June 15, 2009 Do you know the weight of the frame? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sponge Posted June 16, 2009 Report Share Posted June 16, 2009 Did the low-slung chainstay frame that Slinger rode for a while get abandoned? Wasn't that supposed to be the new 'T-Master'? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolver Posted June 16, 2009 Report Share Posted June 16, 2009 The drop-stay bike was quite heavy, I think, and it also had a lot to do with belt-drive which they were trying out. They abandoned that idea, so there was no need for the drop stays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunt man t Posted June 17, 2009 Report Share Posted June 17, 2009 (edited) The drop-stay bike was quite heavy, I think, and it also had a lot to do with belt-drive which they were trying out. They abandoned that idea, so there was no need for the drop stays.WRONG!joe sold me one and it was realy light i loved it too bad it didnt get it realesd and YES it was the new T-master but people refered to it as the 'slinger' frame and yes i needed to change the forks/ stem/ bars before anyone says Edited June 17, 2009 by stunt man t Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskimo Posted June 18, 2009 Report Share Posted June 18, 2009 (edited) Nice but what's with the sticker of a stock rider on the top tube and fork steerer?hehe, well spotted.not really sure how tubes can look to thick but im guessing and hopefully this has been achieved is that the frame design will give maximium stiffness in the frame. i like the look of it, but agree about the fork graphicsI think he means the general diameter of the tubes. Personally i think the graphics are a step in the right direction. Also the geo seems real good providing it's a 72HA. (for me anyway)I presume the design is based upon that Virus WTF frame? Though not keen on the hole drilling area on the headtube. But that's me, and i'm not even a fan of holes in rims, even if they do benefit [edit]And bashguard/ rockring/ skiplate whatever going to be sorted along with hose mounting on the production model? Edited June 18, 2009 by eskimo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.