Guest Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 hi sorry i dont mean to nag but does any one like the new version of trials forum i used to like reading other peoples views on subject but it now seems like uch a task, please could some one from trialsforum i.e. tomturd etc tel me why this change has occured thank you, and if any one else doesnt / likes the new version can you tell me and your reason thank you.p.s. i dont no if it has changed becuase i was validated im not sure sorry if it is because i have been validated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NVWOCI WVS Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 click options (top left) and then 'switch to standard' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam F Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 top right.lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolver Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 hi sorry i dont mean to nag but does any one like the new version of trials forum i used to like reading other peoples views on subject but it now seems like uch a task, please could some one from trialsforum i.e. tomturd etc tel me why this change has occured thank you, and if any one else doesnt / likes the new version can you tell me and your reason thank you.p.s. i dont no if it has changed becuase i was validated im not sure sorry if it is because i have been validated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NVWOCI WVS Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 top right.lol. oh yeah my brains not working very well at the moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greetings Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Perhaps put more care into your posts, they're really difficult to understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Perhaps put more care into your posts, they're really difficult to understand.do you mean me ? and thank you for replying to this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NVWOCI WVS Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 do you mean me ? and thank you for replying to this did it work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 did it work? yes it did thank you, you have removed my depression Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RR_Trials Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 how does the validation process work again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nick Riviera Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 It's not unlike forcing a stool through a sieve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pashley26 Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 (edited) Callum the "silly person" is reading this. How ironic. *edited for CITC Edited January 17, 2009 by Pashley26 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolver Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 It's not unlike forcing a stool through a sieve.Do you mean a wooden, backless seat or a faeces?Either way doesn't sound practical due to various degress of impossibility and vileness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pashley26 Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Do you mean a wooden, backless seat or a faeces?Either way doesn't sound practical due to various degress of impossibility and vileness.Only a foreigner could think like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolver Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 (edited) Only a foreigner could think like that. Whut.Where am I supposed to be from then, punk-ass? Edited January 18, 2009 by Bruce Lee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pashley26 Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 WhutWhere am I from then, punk-ass?San Fran' it would appear hombre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walleee Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 is 'a faeces' gramatically correct?I thought faeces would have been plural??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolver Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 I dunno.Is 'faece' grammatically correct? If faeces is the plural, it would suggest faece is the singular. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadManMike Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 I dunno.Is 'faece' grammatically correct? If faeces is the plural, it would suggest faece is the singular.How small does the stool need to be before it is deemed only a faece?A dog lays faeces, but who knows if it's more than one faece?Intelligent debate... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolver Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 It's not the size, it's the configuration. If the stool appears to be made of multiple units, it would be faeces. If it was of a more single unit design, it would be classed as a faece. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadManMike Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Who's to say that inside the faece there isn't multiple units?And of course if you split it to find out, then it's now faeces anyway.Hah! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walleee Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 I dunno.Is 'faece' grammatically correct? If faeces is the plural, it would suggest faece is the singular.It's not the size, it's the configuration. If the stool appears to be made of multiple units, it would be faeces. If it was of a more single unit design, it would be classed as a faece.We are jumping the gun here guys! we still need to work out if faece is singular and faeces is plural, surley the spelling bee should be able to help us on this matter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom_ Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Surley feacal matter is made up of many feacle particals? therefore there are many feaces? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolver Posted January 18, 2009 Report Share Posted January 18, 2009 Faecal particals aside, what they add up to is faeces, but if the formation of the faeces is an arrangement into multiple concentrations of faeces, then it is faeces. If it arranges into a single concentration, it is a faece.Whether or not faece is an actual word is besides the point. All you must do is write a book with the word in it stating its use, and it can be assimilated into the oxford disctionary, which means it is a real word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamtrials Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 (edited) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Stool_Scale Edited January 19, 2009 by adamtrials Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.