Jake Beach Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Like the colour scheme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason222 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I think that color scheme could possibly the worst looking scheme of any trials bike to date. Frame design looks amazing though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mountian goat Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 (edited) love the colour i think it looks great really wouldnt mind one of them Edited November 29, 2008 by mountian goat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
totaltrials Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 (edited) Bleemin French ay. TechnVOlogyZTechnologyI'm sure there's more Frenchisms from Koxx but I can't remember them.It looks ok, I think the green could be better, it doesn't look right. I don't really see the point in designing a built in tensioner for the frame. What's wrong with horizontal dropouts? I'm not sure if the extra hole at the dropout is another location for the axle to adjust the BB height, but it'd only adjust it by 1mm probably. Seems a bit pointless at the moment but I'll wait until I hear more about it. Edited November 29, 2008 by totaltrials Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
16 years later Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Maybe a different green, think it might look nice in the flesh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Greenan!!!!!!!!!! Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Bike looks very nice. I like the paint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben H! Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Very nice, that colour scheme looks awesome Ben. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max-t Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 (edited) Looks gash! I'm sure it rides just like all the other Ozonys though, Mint!GEO? Edited December 4, 2008 by max-t Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max-t Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 i just wasted my money on a yaabaa!!! damm Whats wrong with it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nathie wafie Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 Whats wrong with it?nothing lol, nicest bike you'l ever ride!! just prefer the looks of the ozonys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lil Jsy Chris Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 Looks interesting, not to sure about it though myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max-t Posted December 4, 2008 Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 nothing lol, nicest bike you'l ever ride!! just prefer the looks of the ozonys Crazy. f**k that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tribal Zone Posted December 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 Bruno Arnold tells us more about the Cannibal 2009 and his "revolution"... Its geometry is adjustable (three different geometries !), its system of chain tension is innovative and it weighs only ... 1.750 kg!More info on Ozonys and in this article :Ozonys Cannibal 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manuel Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 "1084 - 377 - 35 - 72°1085 - 378 - 40 - 71.5°1086 - 380 - 45 - 71°"surely that cant be right ?what happens when you lift your bike up by the rear wheel ? the head angle gets steeper surely ? so how does the geo with +45 have a slacker head angle than the +35 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walker Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 Shame I don't speak french and they still haven't sorted out the English section! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat Smith! Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 Bruno Arnold tells us more about the Cannibal 2009 and his "revolution"... Its geometry is adjustable (three different geometries !), its system of chain tension is innovative and it weighs only ... 1.750 kg!More info on Ozonys and in this article :Ozonys Cannibal 2009pro 2/king? Mat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walker Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 "1084 - 377 - 35 - 72°1085 - 378 - 40 - 71.5°1086 - 380 - 45 - 71°"surely that cant be right ?what happens when you lift your bike up by the rear wheel ? the head angle gets steeper surely ? so how does the geo with +45 have a slacker head angle than the +35 ?Because as you lift the back end up, the bb rise decreases and the head angle gets steeper, think about it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manuel Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 Because as you lift the back end up, the bb rise decreases and the head angle gets steeper, think about it how can the bb rise get less as you lift the rear up ? Im struggling.surely with the hub in the bottom hole you are going to get more bb rise than in the top hole ? and it follows that you get a steeper head angle too ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walker Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 (edited) well try lifting your back wheel off the ground but keep your front wheel down, the axle ends up higher than the bb.. ie negative bb rise.So when its in the bottom hole, the back end is high, therefore the head angle is steep and the bb is low, the opposite applies to it being in the top hole.this clear it up? Edited December 7, 2008 by walker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skoze Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 (edited) As the rear of the frame goes up, there's less difference between the height of the hub axle and the bb axle (poorly explained, but i kinda get it)The angle the chainstay's at gets less steep as it's moved, so the difference gets smaller and the head angle increases.EDIT: Yeah, i think Walker explained it better :$ Edited December 9, 2008 by Skoze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Rainbird Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 Keeping the wheel itself in place and raising the frame can only lead to more BB rise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skoze Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 Yeah, but if they measure it from the hub axle to the bb axle, it'll be less. I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walker Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 (edited) Keeping the wheel itself in place and raising the frame can only lead to more BB riseYeah, now you mention it, i'm wrong, all your doing is pivoting the whole frame and fork on the front axle, so the bb will go up if its put in a lower hole position at the dropout :$ hmmm Edited December 7, 2008 by walker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manuel Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 which leads me to believe they have that backwards on the official ozonyz site ? how gay ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walker Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 dont think you can blame that one on a mis-translation! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.