Dan81 Posted October 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 (edited) ... and sorry.So you should be.Now back to my questions...Debating just getting a more moden set up - b/b (maybe isis I dunno whats best?), crank and screw on chainring. Seems like these bolt on ones are becoming/have become outdated? Are these http://www.selectbikes.com/index.php?act=v...mp;productId=35 Echo cranks any good? then theres the question of what size crank (more confusion). Edited October 21, 2008 by Dan81 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grant_hundley Posted October 21, 2008 Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 if it makes it easier to find a good gear....divide the teeth on the front cog by the ones on backthis gives you a rough idea how hard the gear isthe lower the number, the easier it will beill do some for you...most widely used set ups at the moment18/15 = 1.218/16 = 1.125others that you can use at the moment...22/18 = 1.22222/19 = 1.15722/20 = 1.122/21 = 1.04720/17 = 1.17620/18 = 1.11120/19 = 1.052 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan81 Posted October 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 cheers....I sussed that already but its useful seeing it typed out. How do you build crank length into that or just sort of guess? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grant_hundley Posted October 21, 2008 Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 once you have the ratio of you gear (what i posted up before) times that by how many engagements you have.now divide 360 by that number you just got (gives how many degrees till it engages)so for me it would be... 22/18 = 1.222 * 72 = 88. 360/88 = 4.090. so i get an engagement every 4 degrees.now double your crank length and times it by 3.14now divide it by 360 and times by the number of degreesso for me it would be 350*3.14 = 1099/360 = 3.052 * 4.090 = 12.482this means you have to move the crank 12.482mm to get an engagement (22-18 gearing using a chris king)was that what you were after? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan81 Posted October 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 For someone like me of the "**** it, I can probably make that." mentality, its probably overkill but yep, at least I can work it out before forking out. Appreciate that - thanks.Any thoughts on the echo cranks anyone? or just put the £ towards middleburns (is 16T front going to be the new standard?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grant_hundley Posted October 21, 2008 Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 'burns are stronger, stiffer and lighter (i think)but echo's are cheap.....i'd go with the burns personally, i've owned both and my echo's snapped.the 16t bash's are alright, chains are more prone to snapping and when the sprocket wears out, you have to pay a lot to get it replaced.thought about 'burns with the heatsink bash? solid bash's with replacement sprockets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan81 Posted October 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 (edited) remember people using middleburns when i last was into riding so looks like theyre pretty much tried and tested. think im better goin with those if I do anything.thanks again Edited October 21, 2008 by Dan81 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.