Danny Swindlehurst Posted April 20, 2008 Report Share Posted April 20, 2008 (edited) a little site i made for myself its not full yfinished yet still alot off things to go on and sort out but see what you think !ive left it a very simple design....youll get the jisst !!http://www.dannyswindlehurst.1hwy.com/index.htmldanny Edited April 23, 2008 by Danny Swindlehurst Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat Smith! Posted April 20, 2008 Report Share Posted April 20, 2008 shweeeeet simple wepsight u got theres.Matx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pengsmelly Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 really simple and nice website there danny, i like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Rigg Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 Beast dan! When am i getting my camera back!??! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phatmike Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 Wow.To be honest, I'm not quite sure where to begin. Spelling? Dozens of spelling and grammar mistakes, as well as some things which just make no sense. Fair enough, trying to promote your riding, yet; "Ultimate ambition: Marry Rachel" Don't really think that's needed on there to be honest mate."I now stand at proberly one off the best street riders in the uk" That doesn't even make sense even if it were true. I'm sure if you read the content on there, and made edits accordingly, it would at least read better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan P Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 And on top of what Michael said, you've also got images on there which you have no permission to use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Swindlehurst Posted April 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 And on top of what Michael said, you've also got images on there which you have no permission to use.what you onna bout there mine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan P Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 I think you'll find the two images named 'Leeds 2007' actually belong to me, as I took these images im the author so I hold copyright. So basically get 'em down fool.Stefan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 (edited) I think you'll find the two images named 'Leeds 2007' actually belong to me, as I took these images im the author so I hold copyright. So basically get 'em down fool.Stefan.same for the mj ones with me, but im not a fanny, and wont ask u to take em down loljust if ur gonna use me pics, at least get my name near themDave harding.oh also danny, keep those leeds pics up and see what this guy actually does about it. Edited April 22, 2008 by Davetrials Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Rainbird Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 I fully agree with Mike's comments, not a big fan to be fair.The content isn't great, the spelling and grammar put me off, it loads to a massive (not particularly attractive ) off centre picture on the home page...What's the score with photo use? If you are the subject of the photo, yet someone else took it, you aren't allowed to use it without permission? Seems like there must be more to it than that, but I have no idea... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan P Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 (edited) I fully agree with Mike's comments, not a big fan to be fair.The content isn't great, the spelling and grammar put me off, it loads to a massive (not particularly attractive ) off centre picture on the home page...What's the score with photo use? If you are the subject of the photo, yet someone else took it, you aren't allowed to use it without permission? Seems like there must be more to it than that, but I have no idea...Basically who ever the author of the photos is, holds copyright on them, i.e. I hold copyright on these images, so he has no say weather they stay up or not. Now if Danny had taken a different approach and had mentioned that they are my images, a bit of recognition, I may of seen this differently, As this is not the case, Il have complete removal of my images.Stefan. Edited April 22, 2008 by Stefan P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr ailsbury Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 To be fair though they're pictures of him so you can't really say that he can't use them...either way website looks alright for a first try to be honest... would be better if the title wasn't just bold and basic.. make it a bit more interesting like. also like people have said, spelling mistakes need sorting, and maybe instead of the little albums just have a picture and then the title comes up when you open the image, or just have the full images straight off so you can just scroll through them.looks areet though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenLeacock™ Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 Basically who ever the author of the photos is, holds copyright on them, i.e. I hold copyright on these images, so he has no say weather they stay up or not. Now if Danny had taken a different approach and had mentioned that they are my images, a bit of recognition, I may of seen this differently, As this is not the case, Il have complete removal of my images.Stefan.Couldnt he however say you didnt have permission to take pictures of him? Orrr if you wanted your name on them should of watermarked them before you put them on the internet ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Kearns Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 Couldnt he however say you didnt have permission to take pictures of him? Orrr if you wanted your name on them should of watermarked them before you put them on the internet ?The problem with that debate Ben. Danny Was fully clothed, So nothing sexual can be done with the images. It's not like Danny's Gonna' say, No don't take pictures of me riding my bike is it ? Nah didn't think so. Stop been a bitch, follow the rules of Copyright and move on, Everyone that is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N Roach Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 Simple site but gets the point across. Sort the spelling out.Couldnt he however say you didnt have permission to take pictures of him? Orrr if you wanted your name on them should of watermarked them before you put them on the internet ?I agre with Him. I think you have to state weither or not you give promission for others to use your photographs, from the original source. If I was you, I'd be pleased that my photos were featured in Dannys site... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenLeacock™ Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 The problem with that debate Ben. Danny Was fully clothed, So nothing sexual can be done with the images. It's not like Danny's Gonna' say, No don't take pictures of me riding my bike is it ? Nah didn't think so. Stop been a bitch, follow the rules of Copyright and move on, Everyone that is.I wasn't bitching, just im not to sure how it works... sorry if it came across that way ! ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Kearns Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 Simple site but gets the point across. Sort the spelling out.I agre with Him. I think you have to state weither or not you give promission for others to use your photographs, from the original source. If I was you, I'd be pleased that my photos were featured in Dannys site...Im sure he was pleased, as im sure all photographers would be. But do people think Photography is something free ? These people have to make some money. Stefan was quite clearly stating he wants some recognistion next to his work or remove the images, It's quite simple to be honest. Its like on my myspace, I state who took the photo and if it's edited, who edited it. Abit of recognition for someone producing a decent photo of you doing something you love is not hard to give.Back to comments on Danny's website. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadManMike Posted April 22, 2008 Report Share Posted April 22, 2008 Fair enough, trying to promote your riding, yet; "Ultimate ambition: Marry Rachel"Born in '91 too - Marriage should not be on your cards just yet pal! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Swindlehurst Posted April 23, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 updated again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan. Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 only spelling mistakes i noticed dan like the site, simple n fresh n all that bollox "the year goes buy" by" New ! pictures added to albem" album"Thease are the companys that are supporting danny for 2008!" these Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Rainbird Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Opening up to a home page with a huge, poor quality, off centre image, as well as terrible spelling and grammar really doesn't make me want to look at anything else on the site I'm afraid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookyboy Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Spelling and grammar has really gone to shit! made me not want to look any further. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moose Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 Sweet & simple budd, I really liked it Danny x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeHayes Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 Im sure he was pleased, as im sure all photographers would be. But do people think Photography is something free ? These people have to make some money. Stefan was quite clearly stating he wants some recognistion next to his work or remove the images, It's quite simple to be honest. Its like on my myspace, I state who took the photo and if it's edited, who edited it. Abit of recognition for someone producing a decent photo of you doing something you love is not hard to give.Back to comments on Danny's website.Wasnt Stefen going mad because you put a picture he took on the internet Danny lol ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted April 25, 2008 Report Share Posted April 25, 2008 u can keep my images danny, im not an uptight arsehole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.