The Stig Posted September 13, 2007 Report Share Posted September 13, 2007 hey guys as it says what they like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigman Posted September 13, 2007 Report Share Posted September 13, 2007 They are loverly frames, i had one for over year, geometry is around 1085, 380cs, 72deg HA, 690mm reach (mega long) and 10mm BB rise max....I loved mine, for the time they were released the geometry was soooo good, still goot frames, i don't know of many dieing either.Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stig Posted September 13, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2007 They are loverly frames, i had one for over year, geometry is around 1085, 380cs, 72deg HA, 690mm reach (mega long) and 10mm BB rise max....I loved mine, for the time they were released the geometry was soooo good, still goot frames, i don't know of many dieing either.Adamlegend mate cleared that up nicely!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash-Kennard Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 yeah, BT's generally ride pretty well, and are lighter than most frames, just people like deng bikes now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl Butcher Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 They are really nice bikes to ride they gap so easy and just sit on the rearwheel! i have the 6.0 i wouldnt get rid of it for anything!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cristoff Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 looks like malcoms giant to be honest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash-Kennard Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 looks like malcoms giant to be honestyour a total f**kwit. you really are. they look nothing alike and ride very differently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bionic Balls Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 they feel really long to me....if you can get a 5...well...you'll be reet happy! i was.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cristoff Posted September 14, 2007 Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 your a total f**kwit. you really are. they look nothing alike and ride very differentlywhoa arseface, thats just my opinion, looks a little alike in my opinion, and i didn't say anything about them riding the same did i? maybe your should read my f**king posts before you slate me you willylove love xx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stig Posted September 14, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2007 whoa arseface, thats just my opinion, looks a little alike in my opinion, and i didn't say anything about them riding the same did i? maybe your should read my f**king posts before you slate me you willylove love xxAlright calm down children So swap for a my vario only straight swap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash-Kennard Posted September 15, 2007 Report Share Posted September 15, 2007 whoa arseface, thats just my opinion, looks a little alike in my opinion, and i didn't say anything about them riding the same did i? maybe your should read my f**king posts before you slate me you willylove love xxwell ok then. all trials bikes look the same, theyve got no seat.that is about as helpful a comment you left Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basher Posted September 21, 2007 Report Share Posted September 21, 2007 No point me making a new topic so will ask on this one, Anyone no the full geo of a bt raven 5 includeing weight? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Cristoff Posted September 21, 2007 Report Share Posted September 21, 2007 they look a little similar ash! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam-Griffin Posted September 21, 2007 Report Share Posted September 21, 2007 He has got a point they do look very similar Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigman Posted September 21, 2007 Report Share Posted September 21, 2007 Wow they do look realy similar! (please detect sarcasm they look completely different, apart from they both have black paint!)The geo is sooo different between the 2 aswell!Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basher Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 Anyone no answer to my question about geo of a bt raven 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigman Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 Anyone no answer to my question about geo of a bt raven 5It is fairly similar to the BT4 but i have a feeling that the head angle is not quite as steep anmd it has a little more bb rise, They are also realy nice frames, i have had one of them too Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duggyd Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 No point me making a new topic so will ask on this one, Anyone no the full geo of a bt raven 5 includeing weight?Head angle: 71 degreesWheelbase: 1080 mmBB height: +12 mm with 420 mm forkChainstays: 375 mmSeat tube: 170 mmBB shell: 68 mmHeadtube length: 100 mmColor: white or blackWeight: 2100 gVoila Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leemekeetja Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 my friend told me that the 4.0 is the best bike he ever had. i mean the geo of the frame.his ridin' a doubledisc Simtra ST-1 at the moment.And soon we'll be gettin' a czar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigman Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 Head angle: 71 degreesWheelbase: 1080 mmBB height: +12 mm with 420 mm forkChainstays: 375 mmSeat tube: 170 mmBB shell: 68 mmHeadtube length: 100 mmColor: white or blackWeight: 2100 gVoila I am pretty sure that the chainstays are not that short! deffinatly didn't feel it on my 5, i think they are 380, which would mean the wb was 1085 which is what mine came out as Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basher Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 I am pretty sure that the chainstays are not that short! deffinatly didn't feel it on my 5, i think they are 380, which would mean the wb was 1085 which is what mine came out as AdamIts strange because ive just got meself one and i had a levelboss with 380 chainstays before and i had to shorten the chain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.