ConnorPowell Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 (edited) . Edited August 20, 2007 by OnzaTvee23 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoNnY__Mc Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 Looks okay to me If you can bring your body/knees into that position on the way up during a sidehop you will get higher It is important that you do this on the way up/peak of the move rather than upon landing though But the position of your body looks mint, I wish I tucked that way, I tuck down into the bb area rather than over the back wheel to the side Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gianttrials Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 looks like ur tucking on a curb lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trialsguru Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 please tell me this is a joke, this whole sidehop tuck crap is getting on my tits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Has anyone seen my shoe? Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 Yeah I just want to clarify that 'tucking' isnt a technique like sidehopping or gapping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Harrison Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 please tell me this is a joke, this whole sidehop tuck crap is getting on my tits.I know! Totally agree. Whatever happened to just getting on the wall? Why this obsession with 'tucking'? I saw Martyn Ashton sidehop 44" over a bar the other weekend, with no tucking (and from two wheels). Why the need to tuck on things lower than this? I used to 40+ onto walls left or right without 'tucking'.First saw it when Vince did it, but Vince was going over 50 inches, and I think at that sort of height he had no choice. It's like a trump card, but people seem to be playing it too early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spode@thinkbikes Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 I know! Totally agree. Whatever happened to just getting on the wall? Why this obsession with 'tucking'? I saw Martyn Ashton sidehop 44" over a bar the other weekend, with no tucking (and from two wheels). Why the need to tuck on things lower than this? I used to 40+ onto walls left or right without 'tucking'.First saw it when Vince did it, but Vince was going over 50 inches, and I think at that sort of height he had no choice. It's like a trump card, but people seem to be playing it too early.Hear hear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat Smith! Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 I know! Totally agree. Whatever happened to just getting on the wall? Why this obsession with 'tucking'? I saw Martyn Ashton sidehop 44" over a bar the other weekend, with no tucking (and from two wheels). Why the need to tuck on things lower than this? I used to 40+ onto walls left or right without 'tucking'.First saw it when Vince did it, but Vince was going over 50 inches, and I think at that sort of height he had no choice. It's like a trump card, but people seem to be playing it too early.You telling me he didnt took? at all? legs still straight in the air, if so thats some raw power.But more on the topic, what foot forwards are you and which way do you sidehop, i really cant tell by that picture lol.Matx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConnorPowell Posted August 17, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 I have my right foot foward and i sidehop to the right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monty boi Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 (edited) Why start a whole new topic just because you stuck your arse out a bit, whooptidoo.Adam. Edited August 17, 2007 by monty boi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tylerlovesalex Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 A topic for that? hmm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilikeriding Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 (edited) Are you even on a wall? and why couldnt you tell for yourself if you could tuck, 'right'? and why would you care?.and I bet if you are on a wall it was pointlessly tiny Edited August 17, 2007 by afroman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monty boi Posted August 17, 2007 Report Share Posted August 17, 2007 He's on some grass you can tellAdam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilikeriding Posted August 18, 2007 Report Share Posted August 18, 2007 He's on some grass you can tellAdam lol, yeh its all well and good doing that on grass until you find you cant put it into practise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConnorPowell Posted August 18, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2007 theres a slopped wall there you just cant see it becuse its dark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike W Posted August 18, 2007 Report Share Posted August 18, 2007 Tucking is just what your body does when you push your self not something you practice doing.I agree with the guy that said hes sick of all this tucking sh*t.mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash-Kennard Posted August 18, 2007 Report Share Posted August 18, 2007 please tell me this is a joke, this whole sidehop tuck crap is getting on my tits.play'd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Stig Posted August 18, 2007 Report Share Posted August 18, 2007 play'd+1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 no its not any f**king good, cos ur spending all your time on attempting to tuck, all its doing is hindering the actual height of your sidehops, ill bet if u practised going higher instead of pulling of some stupid f**king tuck that isnt necessary on anything below 45" ud improve no end.even im getting bored of all this now, sorry to single you out who ever you are, but all these people tucking there arse off thinking its getting them sumwere are so annoying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Has anyone seen my shoe? Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 Dave, stop being ignorant, tucks are needed when the rider can go no higher without. It's not at a certain height.'Oh i'm trying to do 45", I can tuck now' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 Dave, stop being ignorant, tucks are needed when the rider can go no higher without. It's not at a certain height.'Oh i'm trying to do 45", I can tuck now'im not being ignorant, i manged to sidehop with out tucking, so did a lot of the other members on here, its just all these newbies doing it at every given opportunity, cos they saw damon do it, and all its doing is slowing them down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bessell Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 i like cheese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davetrials Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 bessel likes cheese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Has anyone seen my shoe? Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 im not being ignorant, i manged to sidehop with out tucking, so did a lot of the other members on here, its just all these newbies doing it at every given opportunity, cos they saw damon do it, and all its doing is slowing them down.Yeah, but you sidehop better when you tuck right?If you give it your all and dont tuck, your sidehop lower then if you tuck right?The same applies no matter how good you are.I agree alot of fairly new people just tuck because it looks good in pictures or whatever but it does help even below 45" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Scarlet Posted August 19, 2007 Report Share Posted August 19, 2007 Yeah, but you sidehop better when you tuck right?If you give it your all and dont tuck, your sidehop lower then if you tuck right?The same applies no matter how good you are.I agree alot of fairly new people just tuck because it looks good in pictures or whatever but it does help even below 45"Cal, I think tucking is only necessary if you are going for 40"+, besides its the old argument of actually tucking the bike into your body or just adding it on once you land. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.