munkee

oh dear god im not going to let this get out of hand. ill agree to disagree.

Your talking about a building with 100's of floors though with an incredible amount of weight. There is nothign to say that internally the structure had already started to collapse. Either way i found this: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/v...ose_frames.html these guys are trying to prove that it was fake or whatever but in doing that they proved my point. The top of the tower began to collapse, floors falling and on the last frame the floors hit where the plane struck. Big explosion.. collapsing begins. Internal failure at the roof where materials are lighter and generally not as well protected, also highly exposed to winds and fire. Also http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/p...cs/wp_wtc29.jpg one whole floor lit up from the fires.

You talk as if once osama is killed or caught they everything will end. It wont.. not even a tiny bit be over. Everyone fighting terrorism currently has bigger issues to sort out than chase after one man and end him. Its not going to solve the bigger picture. Terrorist networks dont work like the age old "take out the ring leader" its just a huge f**k up with religion and jews. If it was left to me we'd bomb the f**k out of all the countries especially iran. What a complete bunch of trouble making f**k ups.

Appauling spelling i know

Jet fuel burns hotter when theres air fueling the fire, it wasnt the fact that it burns its that it was being burned hotter due to the draft from the base of the building running up through to the top where everyone had the windows open. Literally stoking the fire. The floors fell in to a neat pile because it wasnt a case of the building crumbling apart the floors punched through the steel columns. Then litterally slid down on top of the one below. Due to the heat the connections etc holding the floor up couldnt take the weight of both floors and therefore punched through again down on to the next etc etc etc. There are plenty of sources to look at the analysis of the collapse

Thats a bit of a misquote on your part. In a couple of videos i have seen it has been stated " the twin towers are the only two buildings in history to collapse due to fire"... at which point i turned them off. The reason why the twin towers collapsed due to fire was to do with the fire proofing around the 4 centre steel columns which run up its centre. Fire proofing is typically sprayed on as a foam which then sets, it can also be painted on but the spray form gives fire protection for over 2 hours which is stated in building regs (bs:8110) for buildings of that height. However.. when the planes hit the building the explosions of the fuel tanks blew off the foam and partitioning around the columns. Whilst steel does take a long time to reach its deformation point it is inevitably going to happen due to the intensity of the burning (holes in buildings, people opening windows just vented the fire, air rushing in from the base of the building etc). We spent a good few lectures looking over what happened and in my opinion the buildings surpassed all of what was expected of it structurally. This wasnt the only cause, but it was one of the main reasons and why people above the fire were cut off due to the lift shafts and stairs etc. I dont understand where you get the whole.. al qaeda didnt do it.. because they actually admitted to it publicly. If you really want to have two sides of the story.. you mase well have this: http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffith1/refute.htm http://english.pravda.ru/main/2002/09/10/36235.html

i could so feel that coming

Stuff like this really pisses me off. Its not being narrowminded on my part.. its being realistic. I never understand how people buy in to this stuff it has actually no factual back up.. its all one persons perspective making 1000's of links to the end tragedy. Half of the video is just pictures of internet sites and random typed words made to look like x rays of documents. I mean wtf... its the same as that columbine guy or whatever fahrenheit 9/11 dude.. what a complete retard. He's just extreme opposition against the government not some "impartial investigator".

PA Area, philly etc but outside of that of course because i will more than likely die living in philly.

meh islanders get totally the opposite of most of this... pretty much every ride people stop, stare, clap... walk up and ask us about trials.

ill sort it out now sorted, i had to get the D bent guy... keane was 0.1m too much

Pfft! you all know nothing... .. i dont even know who he is lol

Observed doesnt seem even a quarter as populated as trials forum just wondering is trials even smaller in the states than it is here? im going to be moving over there in a couple of years and it would be nice to have some riders around.

I joined the benchwarmers are going to do amazing.. lol i dont even follow football i just chose names ive heard.

I cant help but feel adam looks so puffish here

ah ok then.. so any one riding tmrw? im going gym then im free i think.. and i am saturday

Who is blinky?

pffft sucks cos im not in it!

i was just looking in the HD vid thread .. and JJ said about the guywho released the vid having a new hd camera and probably really excited about it etc but he destroyed the fact it was hd with the wank editing. Then i remembered how awesome your filming and editing is. So.. to put this blunt. BUY A HD VID CAM pleaseeeeeeeee!!! not wanting to bum you too much but you would seriously do the camera and the whole technology justice. Your videos just scream for HD! please please please pleaseeeee

Its been stated atleast 2 times already i think he knows its 2 cross by now. He also stated in the first line of paragraph that he used sheldown browns' guide.

i have one.. i had the w800i as well.. and i have to say.. the w800i was better than the w810i.. the joystick pisses me off the most.. it has one.. but you only use it to like "enter" not to move between selections.. even though it does rock in all directions you have to use the arrow keys to actually highlight stuff. Apart from that it is exactly the same as w800i. No difference from what i can see to be honest.

Sounds interesting enough, picture?

Lol but they have put a different engine in it.. so its not really owning anyone.. if you let them put a new engine in their integras/civics then im sure it would be a different story? i always thought a fair race is put down to driving skill not who has the bigger engine. Any willy can point a car in a straight direction and put their foot down.

After riding stock for nearly 3 years then switching to mod i can safely say the bashplate is the most under rated part about mods. Its so bloody useful its unreal. If you ride natural, trying to get up a rock and f**k up going to front or back wheel. You always seem to find your bashplate has grabbed hold (yes not very uci) and from this you can switch straight back up to backwheel from the plate. This rarely every happened when i rode stock and the fact you only have a bashguard on one side means you have to balance to that side to compensate. The plate also has worked as a great frame saver when it comes to rails in general. On stock i'd find that a bail on a rail would result in a nice dent on the bottom of my down tube either that or it twats the bash and then runs off to the frame. With the bashplate it either just balances on the rail or hits and slides off, but since its longer it soaks up all of the impact resulting in no dent. I seriously cant see why people are sticking bashguards on mods.. there should definitely be more plate orientated mods out there. If its all about clearence then fair enough bur your only gaining a couple of cm at best.

All mission frames should be long dead or atleast put up on ebay to rid the trials world of them. They are purely wank outdated bikes. Definitely stick with an aorta. People get good a lot faster than they used to back in the day when i started riding mostly due to the better component and geometry of frames.