Jump to content

AdamR28

Members
  • Posts

    12366
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    197

Everything posted by AdamR28

  1. Unfortunately they are designed for SPD use, so they will be really stiff and pretty horrible for trials. Bit of shameless self-promotion, just dropped the price on our existing stock of FiveTen Freeriders, and pretty sure we have a size 11 in stock...
  2. They actually have one of each... I think this thread pretty much proves that you can use almost anything as fluid in a hydraulic rim brake!
  3. Either the head tube is flared (stretched), or the caustic soda you used to strip the frame has removed some material too, so the head tube is now oversized.
  4. Yep. Internal = cups go inside the frame (ie. internally), integrated = no cups, bearings go straight into the frame.
  5. You have the right headset there. The headset should be ~44.10mm and the head tube ~44.00mm. On small point to make is that the Onza head tube isn't quite standard so a 'correct' internal headset won't insert fully into the head tube - but that's nothing to do with the diameter. What did you use to remove the anodising? Pretty sure internal headsets are all 44.0mm. Integrated though, that's a minefield.
  6. Bearing in mind the size I had to shrink it down to to fit it on the blog's page, writing in non capitals would've made it pretty tricky to read. As I said, my hand-writing's shit so I thought clear and legible would be the way to go... This was Mark
  7. That's pretty normal and doesn't make any difference to the function of the freewheel.
  8. AdamR28

    Hs11, Hs33

    Seems that the 'new' 2 finger brakes are more powerful than the old ones. As for the lever travel, that's personal preference I guess, but on the 05 model I much prefer the 4-finger blade, and on the new model I prefer the shape of the lever travel on the 2-finger blade .
  9. Mine did that last week - alarm kept gong off by itself too.
  10. Hadn't seen most of the replies to this thread since it got bumped! Mark's got the name pretty much right - I had a very 'tarty' bike maybe 12 years ago so got the nickname 'the tart' amongst riding friends, and 'Tarty Bikes' just kinda ended up as the name! I'm a little humbled by Matt and Juan Manuel's comments, thank you very much guys. I get pretty stressed out with it at times (ask the guys who work here :$ ) but hopefully it's worth it to ensure that you guys can get a decent supply of products. As Matt said, of course there is some financial benefit (or the shop would close down!), but I genuinely feel during day to day work that it's not the main 'driving force' by a long shot luckily! Thanks again.
  11. Longer BB needed, that one looks like a 113 or 118, you'll need 122.5 or 127.5
  12. Yes, and not if you're careful and don't let the piston fall out
  13. Ahh - crossed wires - no need to be sorry! I meant that I didn't think a 2.4", 870g tyre would be any thicker (and thus more puncture resistant) than a Single Ply Maxxis, since if there is more material (to make it puncture resistant) it would have to be heavier. But, it seems like there is somje voodoo magic going on somewhere in the Schwalbe factory
  14. I'm not sure how a tyre at that weight wouldn't be 'Single Ply', but let us know how you get on
  15. To be honest I would leave the pads, if the brake isn't making a squealing noise they should be fine. Disc brakes work on a totally different principle to rim brakes, everything needs to be flat, smooth and free from contaminants (oil, tar, dirt, even the oils in your skin will reduce brake performance!). My advice would be to check the set up again - pads hitting squarely, at the same time, no rubbing etc - then go outside with some cold, clean water and chuck some on the rotors. Scrub the brakes on and off lightly and you will probably start to see black gunk dripping off the rotors. Clean this off (loo roll works great), apply more water, and repeat until the water stays clear. That should clean them up nicely Very difficult to diagnose stuff like this without the bike, but give that a go and things should improve...
  16. AdamR28

    ...

    Yeah that's what I thought.
  17. Draw yourself a diagram, that will definitely be a good start. Edit: Just realised you've already done one. Well you know A + B + D = 180, so A + B = 151. If it's an isosceles triangle then the answer is obvious... Edit: Question was changed! I'm not a complete retard lol
  18. What did you clean everything with first time? If the pads are shiny then that's fine.
  19. To be honest I would re-build it before riding.
  20. AdamR28

    ...

    http://forums.pepipoo.com/lofiversion/index.php/t18947.html http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=2916670
  21. Most of the weight is in the high number of bearings (the hub shell ones are large too) required for a freehub. The freehub body is pretty hefty too (being steel). You've probably got over 100g of bearings in the Pro2, whereas a fixed rear hub will only be about 40g. Then you have the huge bolts... In all honesty I wouldn't bother trying to save weight on the hub, you will notice it a lot more in rotational weight (lighter rim tape, alloy nipples, etc). If you want to shed static weight then the best way would be front freewheel.
×
×
  • Create New...