Matt Vandart

I have a hope pro 2 evo front hub with qr stubs in it, it keeps coming loose and the wheel wobbles. anyone else have this probrem? any idea what to do?

skillz dude

2 words: resistance training burns 30% more fat than cardiac/aerobic alone.

find an old planet x frame they are mint for street

Anyone know how to clean up a dvd ghetto style?

that was well cool, some beasty gapage there

The main difference between conti tyres and schwalbe is that schwalbe tyres suck ass. I really hope this tyre is good, 24" needs a good tyre very badly. being 'black chilli' compound doesn't really denote that it will be mega grippy. As far as I have heard 'Black chili' coumpound is the softest compound of THAT PARTICULAR TYRE. So a 'Black chilli mountain King 2 for example is no where near as grippy as a Der Kaiser which really sucks ass also.

Got an answer: Section 2 of the Dogs Act 1871 Any court of summary jurisdiction may take cognizance of a complaint that a dog is dangerous, and not kept under proper control, and if it appears to the court having cognizance of such complaint that such dog is dangerous, the court may make an order in a summary way directing the dog to be kept by the owner under proper control or destroyed. Basically the above means that if a complaint is made that a dog is dangerous and is not kept under proper control and it goes to court then that court can make a ruling that the owner should keep the dog under proper control or order the dog destroyed. "Proper control is defined as on a lead and muzzled… Dangerous is defined as: Not if the dog was dangerous at the time of the offence but is dangerous… so the dog may even have acted dangerously but not be deemed dangerous for the purposes of the act. The court will be looking at whether the dog is likely to cause injury rather than caused. This makes it very important to get an expert behaviourist who can stand up for you and state that the dog is not dangerous. So if your dog gets into trouble get a behaviourist in… a good one… who will be able to truthfully state in court that your dog is not dangerous. Having said this a court can deem a dog dangerous on the basis of just one incident but it would have to be a biggie." -Trevor Cooper, a lawyer specialising in Canine law Also - Someone who is unlawfully in your home is not protected by the act but… the dog cannot be used as a weapon. (so no setting your chi onto a burglar)The dog however may defend itself. As far as I'm aware the law does not differentiate between Sch training and DIY bite training.

The older forks were better

I love made up statistics..........

This bike is sweet

Dammit, its still shite, bloody vimeo always shite on my puter, gutted cos I do like Carles vids he's a beast

Yeah those wheels are ossum!

duuno about anyone else but when I watch that vid its like a stop action animation, a crap one, and it lokks like they filemd him lining up for a move then stopped it, he climbs up and gets back on his bike so they start filming again.

Hahahahahaha! I think its shite

60 quid!!!! thanks bud

anyone know what mud guard this dude has on this ebay link? http://www.ebay.co.u...6#ht_500wt_1202

do what he says, it works I had one.

Well they are females, lolz

Yeah, a pretty shitty part of a pretty shitty city, Swansea, to be fair last time I was up there, the neighbours said it had calmed down alot since I left (???????) Typical lolz.

You seen Twin town, you seen my old house, literally, its in the movie lolz

Yes it is pretty shit really, at the end of the day though many people think that their dog will protect them if they are attacked, they are living in dream land, with most dogs, excluding a few breeds, they will do one as soon as you kick it. English bullterriers are one such dog that won't labradoors are another. This is not due to an inbredd aggression, these two breeds just generally have high pain thresholds and very low self preservation instincts. Any other dog without training and you can pretty much forget it.

Fair enough, but if you read the thread the answer to all the questions you pose are within. Quick answers are: My Missus, she has done for years. I now live out in the sticks so yes They have just past the age of assessment, dogs should not be trained in protection until they are 2yrs old (assessment is at about 15mnths) This isn't me asking about protection training I am well versed in that aspect, it is from a comment someone made to me about the legal stand on protection trained dogs. I asked on here because it never ceases to amaze me how much the people of trials forum know as a collective. there are people on here from pretty much every walk of life.This question, I am pretty sure is not outwith that knowledge, some fairly good answers have been put forward already. It is also not in trials Chat, more bizarre questions have been asked.

As usual you make a very good point Mr Finger-er.

Protection