Jump to content

Revolver

Members
  • Posts

    16811
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    33

Everything posted by Revolver

  1. Actually, I know a guy who's dog eats shite it finds whilst out for a walk. I saw it with my own eyes!
  2. Is it not? What is it then, O wise OBM?
  3. Electrolysis would do it, but as you say, its inefficient with water so it could never work well enough to power a car. But think, pure oxygen makes stuff burn very quick. Hydrogen is the most volatile/explosive/reactive substance around. Imagine hydrogen going off in pure oxygen... You'd get a scooter engine more powerful than a car. The plus side is, hydrogen + oxygen = water, so when you split the water, then ignite the products, you get more water, which is theoretically an infinite fuel source. Haha, you're a clever one! Yeah, it would be the same with the water if you could split it. You'd only have to top it up every once in a while Some electric cars are pretty quick nowadays.
  4. As soon as someone figures out how to split water into its raw elements, they are RICH RICH turns out it's ridiculously difficult. But anyway, if anyone does chemistry, see what can be done. Oh, and I want 5% 5% would be enough for me to buy microsoft. That's how rich you would be! * * removing the reliance on petrol would actually get you assassinated by shell-oil or southern oil or bp or america.
  5. THe laws of physics says that's impossible Because energy is required to move the car, then the energy is used from the electricity. So if the car could recharge the same energy, that would mean the total energy put back into the battery is greater than the energy expended (otherwise the car uses no energy to move, or the battery depletes) thus meaning energy is gained from an outside source, or if not, it is created, which is impossible according to physics: energy can only be changed between different types. It cannot be created or destroyed.
  6. It is, shame I'm poo/scaredy.
  7. OH MYGOD!!!! I KNEW YOU WERE GOING TO WRITE THAT TOO shit me, I must be psychic.
  8. Frame: Ciguena 24" (as JonMack rightfully said, the 4bolt mounts are dodgy ) Bars: Azonic World Force Stem: Titec Headset: Pig Pro Forks: Ashton 24" Front Hub: Hope Front Rim: Sun Rhyno Lite Front Brake: Avid BB7 Cranks: Middleburn RS7 Pedals: DMR V8 Rear Hub: DMR Revolver Rear Rim: Atomlab aircorp, ground. Freewheel: White Industries ENO Rear Brake: HS33, 04 lever, Koxx brown pads (i think)
  9. I quoted your post and now i can't find the original version of the post.
  10. I have no idea where the post you made with that appalling sum went. Can SMs delete their posts?
  11. haha IF 24"s are street bikes, then they're for urbal assault so Assault bikes? Stock, mod and assault.
  12. hehe, maybe This is in bobber's mill, which is near radford. I dunno where the industrial estate is, maybe it's the Boots factory, but I've not rode there.
  13. Stod they don't need a name! The frame is shaped like a stock, and the wheelsize is closer to that of a stock, but they're flickier than stocks...
  14. I did that and the colour didn't change.
  15. Revolver

    The Stig

    It would make sense for trials helmets to have a chin guard, don't you think? See, if you do a gap and miss and go over the handlebars, there's a good chance you'll smash your jaw.
  16. Is it by any chance from Billy Connolly? Life is a waste of time, and time is a waste of life, get wasted all the time, and you'll have time of your life! Something like that, I'll have to watch it again.
  17. I've been riding actual trials since early february this year, but I've been able to backhop and pedalkick a little longer, albeit not up stuff or far at all And yeah, I reckon I should be able to get that now! Just! I'll give it a shot today. Ought to meet up for another ride soon, what do u reckon?
×
×
  • Create New...